The Brain


Newsvine Top News

Welcome


  • Welcome to Two Babes and a Brain. No, you didn’t read it wrong. We are called Two Babes and a Brain. Yes TWO WOMEN ONE BRAIN. And yes, before you ask, we are ready to take all the comments and jokes that come with that. Allow us to explain. Children fry your brain cells. They suck the intelligence right out of you. They cause you to stare blankly at objects wondering how to use them to do bodily harm—usually you imagine doing bodily harm to yourself because if you do bodily harm to your children, DCYF will have to get involved and that just takes up time you don’t have because---you have children. The two women who run this blog have six children between them. Therefore, they are short on brain power. After some serious mathematical calculations they have come to the conclusion that together they have a total of ONE brain. They feel lucky to have this. Now, on to the Babe issue. To be a Babe, you don’t have to look like Carmen Electra or Katherine Zata Jones. It’s a state of mind. It’s being comfortable in your own skin. A Babe has her own opinions about issues, whether you are talking about politics, sports, education or even the War on Terror. Chris and Lisa definitely have their opinions about almost everything. That’s one reason they created Two Babes and a Brain. And when their opinions are on opposite sides, look out. Katy, bar the door and batten down the hatches cause sh#t’s gonna hit the fan. Chris and Lisa extend an invitation to you to post your comments, questions and yes, even dissenting opinions. But be warned, they love nothing better than a good juicy debate.

AdBrite


Technocrati


Education

Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Half A Chance

Lucky you--you get to read my homework...Assignment: OpEd on policy issue, 750 words, including title

Half a Chance
by Christine Hunsinger

“Mom, what the heck is a test tube baby?”
That was the  yesterday’s question of the day from my ten-year old son.
I explained it, told him that they aren’t called test tube babies any more and asked him where he heard the phrase.
“I read it in my book.”
“What book?”
“Life in Ancient Times.”
Ba-dum bum. He thinks he’s funny.

The exchange made me think about the things that have changed substantially since I was a kid. When I was in schoolhis age, there were no kids like my son in public schools. Back then, kids like him were sent to “special schools.” Go back another ten years, only ancient times if you’re a ten year old, and they were sent to institutions. My son, actually,  Bboth my sons, are autistic.  It must seem like ancient times to 

him.

Special Education is a fairly new phenomenon. It’s just in the last thirty years that we’ve discovered that a learning disability doesn’t always mean you can’t learn; sometimes it simply means you learn differently. The law now recognizes that public schools have an obligation to educate these kids;, educators and specialists have developed ways to do it and parents have found hope that it will be done.

Years ago, when my boys were diagnosed with Autismautism, I read a study that proclaimed, fifty percent of children with aAutism can become typical learners and productive members of society if they receive the right kind of help early on. I didn’t really believe it, and I since feelings trump math, I always silently believed “that fifty percent” meant that, if I was truly lucky, one of my boys would make it and, one wouldn’t. If That’s if I was lucky. But that the statistic stuck with me and in the dark corners of my mind, on the days when I wanted to give up, just quit and go drink MaMargaritasi Tai’s on the beach, “fifty percent” was the magic phrase that made me keep trying.

On September, 24, 2007, an article appeared on the front page of the Providence Journal detailing some of the changes that the state of Rhode Island plans to make to the Special Education program:; topping the list are larger class sizes. and no extended school year. Make no mistake,mistake; these changes are driven guided by only by a desire to save money.

We are always looking for ways to save money and in the field of education, first up on the budget chopping blocks are the Special Ed programs. This past year Cranston and the state, level- funded education. As a result, the Cranston School Department cut over a million dollars from Special Education, before they made any other cuts.

I suspect the reason we look to cut Special Ed first is that most of us don’t have kids with learning disabilities. H If we’re being honestly, most of us don’t really believe these kids can learn, but . they can. To a lot of us, Special Education seems like the promotion of the fantasy that these kids will, someday, be normal.

When my boys were in the “Significant Needs” program; they were in a class of six students. That specialized attention helped me get my miracles. While that might seem like an inefficient use of resources to you,; to my family , it was something close to a miracle.

It’s been five years since the diagnoses, and both boys are in typical classrooms, doing grade level work. They have friends and take karate lessons, ride horses and soon, will start piano lessons., making friends and functioning in their world. If you saw them, you’d think they were just typical kids. They still receive some help, but they are on their way to living normal lives. When they are adults, their father and I won’t have to support them. When we die, the state won’t have to support them. In fact, they’ll be helping to support others with the money they pay in taxes.
Will either one of them be President? I don’t know--; will your kid?

In general, we Americans are not long-term thinkers. Our cities, our states and especially our federal government —don’t seem to plan for next week--, never mind next year or five years down the road. They But they should-- though; we should. If ever there was a compelling case of, “pay for it now or pay more for it later,” this is it.

The other day, I ran into one of the Directors of Special Education. She was excited. She told me, that since they started educating these kinds ofse kids in the right programs with the right teachers and the right supports, “fifty percent” of them had gone from self-contained classrooms to normal classrooms. Half were succeeding in typical classrooms.

The proposed changes to the Special Education regulations will keep others from getting their miracles. It’s time we figure out how to pay for the things these our kids need. It’s time we figure out how to pay for the things our kids need. It’s time we decide what a miracle is worth. It’s time to give these our kids half a chance.


















Wednesday, June 13, 2007

More on education...

There is another article in the NY Times talking about improved test scores. I think improved test scores are great, so long as we keep in mind what they actually represent. As you know, education is somewhat of an obsession for me and now that I will be going to school in the fall all kinds of new questions are popping into my head.

Please understand that I am in no way in favor of seeing the feds take over education. Just thinking about it gives me nightmares. I do, however, wonder about some things...

It is often said that state and local governments are best suited to decide how their education dollars are spent. Is this really true? Are we incapable of determining a set of standards that all American children should have achieved at the end of their public schooling? (Where is Matt when I want to make a reference to Eskimo poetry...)

Is it OK to constantly change the test used to measure progress? The article in the times says they just switched to this test two years ago.

Shouldn't we be able to compare district to district and state to state? Isn't there a test we could give everyone? If kids were being taught the things they should be taught, isn't there a test that would measure it no matter what state they live in?

I don't believe that all things related to education can be measured by a standardized test. No matter how much social scientists want their data to be taken seriously, there is a reason social appears in the phrase social science. Some things are beyond empirical measure...so, while I believe that we should definitely have measures of success in education, are their other things that need to be considered, focused on and taught?

No answers here. Just questions...

Chris

Friday, March 16, 2007

Sorry, but it's education again...

I know. I am beating a dead horse. I am talking about stuff you don't care about. I am sorry but I can't help it. I am nuts. It is IEP season and I always get nuts during IEP season. It is also budget time for the schools and there is not enough money to go around. And so when we cut money and programs we should obviously cut them from the most disadvantages students.

I have been planning to speak on behalf of my local elementary school at the upcoming school board meeting. It is budget time and my school could possible lose three teachers boosting out class size numbers. Fifth grade is apparently on the chopping block and that would boost my oldest kids class size. It isn't huge but it's too big.

Yesterday, I found out that the school committee has already cut a million and some out of the Special Education budget. I found out that my school has been out of compliance on Jacob's IEP for the entire school year. I found out that they had a meeting about my kid without me, without inviting me, without even telling me. I found out that they changed his status from Special Ed to resource.

Here's the thing: Asperger's isn't something you grow out of. It isn't a diagnosis that you can do away with. He didn't just all of a sudden get better. This is part of a push to get the Special Ed kids off the roles so they don't have to pay for them.

They have done away with the Extended School Year programs. Instead of sending these kids to appropriate academic and social settings to work on their problem areas, they are housing all of the Special Ed kids in classrooms in a local school for the summer. By definition, these programs do not advance any academic or social goals they merely maintain the child's current academic level and maintain the child's ability to sit in a classroom so that transition back to school is easier.

There will be no peer models. So, explain to me how this would benefit my kids who spend 95% of their time in the typical classroom with typical peers? If you are searching for the answer, the answer is it won't.

Anyway, I am nuts. The bottom line is there is nothing I can do here. I can do what I've been doing which is educating my own children and paying a phenomenal amount of money to fill in the gaps left by the school and hope that it is enough.

And it's snowing...

GRRRRRRR!

Chris

Friday, March 09, 2007

No Child Left Behind...again

And now the truths about No Child Left Behind begin to trickle out. These are things that those of us who are involved with curriculum or have jobs with the public schools have know for a long time. No Child Left Behind is mostly about money and most of the money given out by the Federal government goes to high priced consultants, testing companies and fancy-schmancy curriculum designers that don't have a clue. Very few dollars trickle down to the classroom. Very few dollars go to train teachers or are spent to provide learning materials to the students.

No Child Left Behind is a huge failure. For a while test scores were going up--but no one asked what the test measured. Did it measure actual knowledge and skill or did it measure how well you were taught to take the test? The answer is B.

Now, we know that only about 50% of all graduating high school students are proficient in English and less than 25% are proficient in math. That is piss poor by any standard but what those scores don't tell you, is that those same students don't know anything about science or history or literature either because those things aren't tested they barely study them at all.

There are some fundamental things missing from education today and no, it's not all the fault of the teacher's union.

A lot of it stems from where we put our priorities and what we teach our children about discipline, working hard and what they have to do. You know what is lacking in education when your child gets one of the good teachers because their attitude changes. They work harder to earn the approval of the teacher. They work harder because it is expected and there are consequences for not working hard.

Without this fundamental principle at work, you can throw all the money and the fancy-schmancy curriculum stuff at kids and it won't make one bit of a difference.

Chris

Friday, February 23, 2007

More complaints about schools...

There is this piece in the NY Times this morning.

OK folks, you send your kids to school to learn and to figure out how to function in society without you. The whole point is for them to grow up and be able to function. Unless you've figured out a way  not to die and a way to get them to let you run their lives forever, they need this.

Stop! You want to raise money for books? Fine. Want to raise money for academic stuff? Great! But no one needs a rock climbing wall, no one needs a fifth grade dance that costs 15,000 dollars to put on and no one needs a father-daughter dance that costs 40 bucks to attend, not including the pictures, dress or shoes. No kindergarten kid should show up to the father daughter dance in a limo.

If you want to go to the prom, stay in school and keep your legs closed until you are a junior in high school; then you can go.

Just because you left your job to stay at home with your kids and you are bored doesn't mean that you belong involved or over-involved in this stuff. Take up knitting or something.

Chris

NCLB Test Scores

I'm not a big fan of NCLB. The idea is nice but the execution stinks.

High school seniors are performing worse overall on some national tests than they did in the previous decade, even though they are receiving significantly higher grades and taking what seem to be more rigorous courses, according to government data released yesterday.

About 35 percent of 12th-graders tested in 2005 scored proficient or better in reading -- the lowest percentage since the test was launched in 1992, the new data showed. And less than a quarter of seniors scored at least proficient on a new version of the math test; (Article here)

First, let me say 35% and 25% are failing grades. They aren't just failing grades, they are WICKED failing grades. Anyone who wants to be scared now, because the next generation isn't going to be able to read the directions on a bottle of shampoo or balance their checkbook can join me in the bomb shelter.

It isn't just the inner-city poor minority kids who are flunking these assessment tests--can't be. Aren't enough inner-city minority kids to make up 65 and 75 percent of all kids taking the test.

So, why are we producing less than proficient students?

Continue reading "NCLB Test Scores" »

Thursday, February 15, 2007

Standards Based Education...

I am a big fan of public schools. I know many of you are not but I am. Sure, I have my complaints with my own public schools. They range from the school department wasting money to the city having a less than overwhelming commitment to their special needs students but overall I think public schools are a good thing.

Or I did. Now, I am not so sure. For the record, my children are doing fine. All of them, while far from perfect, are at grade level and are bringing home acceptable or better than acceptable grades. They are all learning and progressing. It's going well.

But change is just around the corner--again.

Continue reading "Standards Based Education..." »

Friday, June 02, 2006

WRONG! SO WRONG!

A couple of weeks ago, I received the dreaded notice from my daughter's school. Someone in her class had head lice. We were lucky. She was out of school when it happened and we did not--knock on wood--contract the dreaded bug thing.

A few days later, I was talking to a neighbor who said the reason the note was so late in coming home was that they don't have to report such things until there are 3 confirmed cases in the same class. $#%^%^#$%#!! And the policy doesn't require you to be nit or egg free when you return...

Anyone care to guess why? Cuz let me tell you, it didn't used to be that way. You had lice--your butt went home until every bug was dead and every nit was removed and you got checked by the nurse when you came back and EVERYONE KNEW. The note went home that day and everyone got checked when they came back the next day.

Well, I can't link to the article because it didn't appear in the online version of the paper but...apparently No Child Left Behind plays a large roll in this. Because attendance is one of the criteria used to judge successful schools, and lice keeps you out of school for days, they have changed their policy.

Also, the Association of Pediatricians has decided that children who are not ill--and lice doesn't count as sick--should not miss school and so their recommendation has been changed as well.

This means a kid can return to school if he has nits in his head. Nits are eggs. 18 percent of lice eggs hatch. If the head has been treated the chance of the eggs hatching is "low."

Umm...no friggin way. This is stupid. Of course the article talks about the stigma of lice and the fact that kids get made fun of and I gotta tell you, I don't care. They will live.

My kids have long and thick hair. I have more than all three of them combined. The lice thing is a nightmare of mine. Everyone should have to stay home until the are 100% lice and nit free.

C'mon  folks...these are bugs we are talking about...

blech...

Chris

Thursday, May 25, 2006

I Had to Read This Twice...

..because I truly couldn't believe what I was reading.  The Michigan education system wants to remove the word "America" or "American" from being used...written...or spoken in their school system.

Apparently someone told them that we merged with Canada and Mexico because they now want to call their students "Northern Americans".....

WTF ????...

Lisa

Hat tip:  Cappy ... again  ... he can find the best stuff.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

HELP!

I really need your help. I need you to read the passage (click continue reading) and answer the following question:

Who do you think caught the first fish?

Seriously, I don't want to give too much away but I think the teacher is wayoff base here...and it is driving me nuts.

This is the same teacher who thinks that Jim and Don was going is correct english...sigh...so read on please...

Chris

Continue reading "HELP! " »

Search


  • Google
    Web TwoBabes

Sitemeter

Ecosystem



Google Ads


amazon stuff


  • Search Now:
    Amazon Logo